<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 successful logo redesigns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns</link>
	<description>For logo designers and all who love logos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou Sparx</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-11470</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Sparx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-11470</guid>
		<description>Great post, David. I feel #8 Delta isn&#039;t a very good re-design and it seems to have gone back in time. Does anyone else feel this is also true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, David. I feel #8 Delta isn&#8217;t a very good re-design and it seems to have gone back in time. Does anyone else feel this is also true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana De Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-11164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana De Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-11164</guid>
		<description>many of the redesigned logos look really good, some of them have small changes that make big difference.  my favorite is the &quot;toys r us&quot; logo  and i prefer how the hunter logo look before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many of the redesigned logos look really good, some of them have small changes that make big difference.  my favorite is the &#8220;toys r us&#8221; logo  and i prefer how the hunter logo look before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mingo</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>Mingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>1.I like the new green that they used on the letters.
4.It is true that this new logo looks like adobe&#039;s hehe
9.NFL new logo looks great! the football is more defined (it previously looked like a torta)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.I like the new green that they used on the letters.<br />
4.It is true that this new logo looks like adobe&#8217;s hehe<br />
9.NFL new logo looks great! the football is more defined (it previously looked like a torta)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-10811</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-10811</guid>
		<description>very useful.

Shame you&#039;ve not added perhaps THE best example of successful rebranding: BP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very useful.</p>
<p>Shame you&#8217;ve not added perhaps THE best example of successful rebranding: BP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>@Jen Marsh - The new Chevron logo is awful. The gradient adds nothing. A ribbon cannot be folded like that - the bottom would be flat not pointed. And as a folded ribbon it ceases to be a *chevron*, which is a flat, v-shaped heraldic device. The change is utterly moronic and reeks of a marketing weasel trying to be &quot;Web 2.0&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jen Marsh &#8211; The new Chevron logo is awful. The gradient adds nothing. A ribbon cannot be folded like that &#8211; the bottom would be flat not pointed. And as a folded ribbon it ceases to be a *chevron*, which is a flat, v-shaped heraldic device. The change is utterly moronic and reeks of a marketing weasel trying to be &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mundir</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-9600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mundir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-9600</guid>
		<description>Logo re-design requires special talent. The hunter logo and science channel have great re-makes. I love them. Great post. Keep the good stuff coming!

Do not like the kangaroo logo though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logo re-design requires special talent. The hunter logo and science channel have great re-makes. I love them. Great post. Keep the good stuff coming!</p>
<p>Do not like the kangaroo logo though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brand New &#171; Berrin Sun&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-9462</link>
		<dc:creator>Brand New &#171; Berrin Sun&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-9462</guid>
		<description>[...] blog of Sabancı University VACD students. I knew about Brand New from logodesignlove&#8217;s post, 10 successful logo redesigns. Brand New is a division of UnderConsideration, and its sole purpose is to chronicle and provide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-image: url(http://www.logodesignlove.com/wp-content/themes/grid_focus_public/images/comment-logo.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; padding-left: 0px; padding-top: 35px; padding-bottom: 9px">
<p>[...] blog of Sabancı University VACD students. I knew about Brand New from logodesignlove&#8217;s post, 10 successful logo redesigns. Brand New is a division of UnderConsideration, and its sole purpose is to chronicle and provide [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup of Logo Inspiration Roundups at ESTHETIC CORE &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-8672</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup of Logo Inspiration Roundups at ESTHETIC CORE &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-8672</guid>
		<description>[...] 10 successful logo redesigns When a logo is used for a number of years, the brand awareness that is amassed can prove a valuable tool in the marketing arsenal of large corporations. With that in mind, logo re-designs often implement subtle changes to refresh the look whilst considering customer recognition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-image: url(http://www.logodesignlove.com/wp-content/themes/grid_focus_public/images/comment-logo.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; padding-left: 0px; padding-top: 35px; padding-bottom: 9px">
<p>[...] 10 successful logo redesigns When a logo is used for a number of years, the brand awareness that is amassed can prove a valuable tool in the marketing arsenal of large corporations. With that in mind, logo re-designs often implement subtle changes to refresh the look whilst considering customer recognition. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the props, Steven. Glad to have you come and visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the props, Steven. Glad to have you come and visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Skaggs</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/10-successful-logo-redesigns/comment-page-3#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Skaggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=144#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>The only disagreement I have is the NFL Logo. Yes, good choice to limit starts and make simpler, but what&#039;s with that stiff typography that no longer relates to the frame of the shield? And really, it is pretty lame to begin with, isn&#039;t it, so they could have kept going. By the way, great website for students of visual identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only disagreement I have is the NFL Logo. Yes, good choice to limit starts and make simpler, but what&#8217;s with that stiff typography that no longer relates to the frame of the shield? And really, it is pretty lame to begin with, isn&#8217;t it, so they could have kept going. By the way, great website for students of visual identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
