<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15 wonderfully simple logo designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs</link>
	<description>For graphic designers and all who love logos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-28219</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-28219</guid>
		<description>I really like these astonishing simple but effective logotypes. There is one I would like to nominate for the list; the Boeing logo. It’s so simple and stylish; I can really feel the power and speed and just wish to get airborne when I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like these astonishing simple but effective logotypes. There is one I would like to nominate for the list; the Boeing logo. It’s so simple and stylish; I can really feel the power and speed and just wish to get airborne when I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-24982</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-24982</guid>
		<description>A lovely list, I&#039;ve always been quite fond of this one...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12break3/4707142170/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lovely list, I&#8217;ve always been quite fond of this one&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12break3/4707142170/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/12break3/4707142170/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-23659</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-23659</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I know this article has been around for a while but I enjoyed reading it again. I wondered if you agree with some of my observations I made in a follow up article to this on my blog:-

http://www.oakleafstudio.co.uk/simple-logo-design/

It would be interesting to get your viewpoint.

Regards

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I know this article has been around for a while but I enjoyed reading it again. I wondered if you agree with some of my observations I made in a follow up article to this on my blog:-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oakleafstudio.co.uk/simple-logo-design/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oakleafstudio.co.uk/simple-logo-design/</a></p>
<p>It would be interesting to get your viewpoint.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-22068</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 02:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-22068</guid>
		<description>You know what I find funny, I completely agree with the fact that the most popular most recognizable logos are simple and flat. 

But, most start up companies looking for a logo seem to not recognize that fact. They are always looking dynamic complex logos. Also, if you look on crowdspring at any given time of they day, you will see nothing but complex, overdone (at times) logos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I find funny, I completely agree with the fact that the most popular most recognizable logos are simple and flat. </p>
<p>But, most start up companies looking for a logo seem to not recognize that fact. They are always looking dynamic complex logos. Also, if you look on crowdspring at any given time of they day, you will see nothing but complex, overdone (at times) logos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Herron</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-21450</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-21450</guid>
		<description>For me, the logo for &#039;The Waterways Trust&#039; and &#039;Families&#039; are the most intelligent identities on that (esteemed) list.

The others are all good - but those two are the stand-out ones in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the logo for &#8216;The Waterways Trust&#8217; and &#8216;Families&#8217; are the most intelligent identities on that (esteemed) list.</p>
<p>The others are all good &#8211; but those two are the stand-out ones in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airey</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-19876</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-19876</guid>
		<description>Hello Denis, I sent you the following email, which I guess didn&#039;t get through:

---

Thanks very much for reading my book, and for asking your question (it was an oversight of mine not to include the name of the new font).

It&#039;s called Apex New.

http://www.vllg.com/foundries/Thirstype#panel=news-gallery

All the very best,

David

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Denis, I sent you the following email, which I guess didn&#8217;t get through:</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Thanks very much for reading my book, and for asking your question (it was an oversight of mine not to include the name of the new font).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called Apex New.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vllg.com/foundries/Thirstype#panel=news-gallery" rel="nofollow">http://www.vllg.com/foundries/Thirstype#panel=news-gallery</a></p>
<p>All the very best,</p>
<p>David</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-19875</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-19875</guid>
		<description>Hi

Reading Logo Design Love and finding it an elegant and stimulating book. I was wondering if anyone can help identify the font that Armin Vit used in the JCJ Architecture illustration on page 73. David says it was Helvetica Neue before rebranding but doesn&#039;t say in the book what the final revised font was. Any leads gratefully received! 

Denis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Reading Logo Design Love and finding it an elegant and stimulating book. I was wondering if anyone can help identify the font that Armin Vit used in the JCJ Architecture illustration on page 73. David says it was Helvetica Neue before rebranding but doesn&#8217;t say in the book what the final revised font was. Any leads gratefully received! </p>
<p>Denis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigmund Werthers</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-19829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigmund Werthers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-19829</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love simple logos that work. Because more effort is given on the concept rather than a beautiful visual interpretation per se. So if successful, they are straight to the point and directly understood, hence smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love simple logos that work. Because more effort is given on the concept rather than a beautiful visual interpretation per se. So if successful, they are straight to the point and directly understood, hence smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And now for some great logos &#124; Worthwhile Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-14802</link>
		<dc:creator>And now for some great logos &#124; Worthwhile Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-14802</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I sent you to a web site that showcased bad logos, so to make up for that, here&#8217;s a couple of places that showcase great logos. This Webdesigner Depot post has a collection of logos that contain a little hidden symbolism, and this Logo Design Love post from a couple of years ago illustrates how simple logos are best. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-image: url(http://www.logodesignlove.com/wp-content/themes/grid_focus_public/images/comment-logo.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; padding-left: 0px; padding-top: 35px; padding-bottom: 9px">
<p>[...] Yesterday I sent you to a web site that showcased bad logos, so to make up for that, here&#8217;s a couple of places that showcase great logos. This Webdesigner Depot post has a collection of logos that contain a little hidden symbolism, and this Logo Design Love post from a couple of years ago illustrates how simple logos are best. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Holm</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/comment-page-2#comment-14460</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Holm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs#comment-14460</guid>
		<description>Shell and London Underground is two of my favourite logos. But my number one favourite is the swedish &quot;ICA&quot; logo, red, simple and clean. It haven&#039;t changed for over 40 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shell and London Underground is two of my favourite logos. But my number one favourite is the swedish &#8220;ICA&#8221; logo, red, simple and clean. It haven&#8217;t changed for over 40 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.logodesignlove.com/15-wonderfully-simple-logo-designs/feed ) in 0.19247 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 12:56 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 1:56 pm UTC -->
