<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glasgow 2014 Games logo revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed</link>
	<description>For graphic designers and all who love logos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Chasteauneuf</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-24355</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Chasteauneuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-24355</guid>
		<description>Just been looking at the supporting literature on Marque&#039;s site which I think looks really good. To be honest I don&#039;t mind the logo as a symbol. It looks structurally elegant in my opinion. My main concerns would be that it doesn&#039;t really work with the bottom part. It looks really difficult to work with though - combining 2 symbols/logos is always hard as they are designed to be distinctive on their own. If you were going to have a standard base it should have been more subtle allowing the main logo to dictate the feel not compete against it.

I do find the explanations of line lengths silly. As some of the comments above have said, it has to work on its own - its a symbol. Who cares how what fraction of the line really is - it doesn&#039;t really make it work better as a logo. 

My other main concern is that it does REALLY resemble the Common Guild logo. Actually surprised they have not made a fuss about this - especially as its the same agency. Massive fan of Marque though - one of my favourite agencies. So inclined to agree with many of the comments above - too much design by committee and red tape for it to be as good as it could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just been looking at the supporting literature on Marque&#8217;s site which I think looks really good. To be honest I don&#8217;t mind the logo as a symbol. It looks structurally elegant in my opinion. My main concerns would be that it doesn&#8217;t really work with the bottom part. It looks really difficult to work with though &#8211; combining 2 symbols/logos is always hard as they are designed to be distinctive on their own. If you were going to have a standard base it should have been more subtle allowing the main logo to dictate the feel not compete against it.</p>
<p>I do find the explanations of line lengths silly. As some of the comments above have said, it has to work on its own &#8211; its a symbol. Who cares how what fraction of the line really is &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t really make it work better as a logo. </p>
<p>My other main concern is that it does REALLY resemble the Common Guild logo. Actually surprised they have not made a fuss about this &#8211; especially as its the same agency. Massive fan of Marque though &#8211; one of my favourite agencies. So inclined to agree with many of the comments above &#8211; too much design by committee and red tape for it to be as good as it could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCD</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-23230</link>
		<dc:creator>DCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-23230</guid>
		<description>The original candidate logo was fine -- Glasgow in Mockintosh script in front of a torch, where the &quot;torch flame blowing in the wind was a colourful tartan that also somehow resembled the lines/ lanes of a running track in perspective, perhaps with hurdles, and even a yellow V for victory -- and the pointy bottom of the torch poked below the text to give a Glasgow holding the event feel.  It kind of made sense, seemed Scottish, had the Glasgow element and the sport and sporting occasion elements -- it was inoffensive, recognisable and unique -- all the elements of a damn good logo.  

The new logo retains the bottom of the torch (why?), the Glasgow font has gone, and so has the tartan.  This is definitely less Scottish in flavour.  Sport associations could be drawn if the circularity was a track, a target,a discus -- or even a ball, but that&#039;s not really very obvious and is quite a stretch of the imagination.  The only thing I can think that could sell it a wee bit better would be if that circle represented the new Arena being built beside the Armadillo. Not a lot of folks know what it will look like.  You missed a chance to have upturned the bottom portion of the logo (the bit that survived from the original torch one), because that could have been the new arena&#039;s domed roof in elevation -- and so the logo would have been a plan and elevation on this new Norman Foster building that is the centre for the games and for the Gymnastics the follow year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original candidate logo was fine &#8212; Glasgow in Mockintosh script in front of a torch, where the &#8220;torch flame blowing in the wind was a colourful tartan that also somehow resembled the lines/ lanes of a running track in perspective, perhaps with hurdles, and even a yellow V for victory &#8212; and the pointy bottom of the torch poked below the text to give a Glasgow holding the event feel.  It kind of made sense, seemed Scottish, had the Glasgow element and the sport and sporting occasion elements &#8212; it was inoffensive, recognisable and unique &#8212; all the elements of a damn good logo.  </p>
<p>The new logo retains the bottom of the torch (why?), the Glasgow font has gone, and so has the tartan.  This is definitely less Scottish in flavour.  Sport associations could be drawn if the circularity was a track, a target,a discus &#8212; or even a ball, but that&#8217;s not really very obvious and is quite a stretch of the imagination.  The only thing I can think that could sell it a wee bit better would be if that circle represented the new Arena being built beside the Armadillo. Not a lot of folks know what it will look like.  You missed a chance to have upturned the bottom portion of the logo (the bit that survived from the original torch one), because that could have been the new arena&#8217;s domed roof in elevation &#8212; and so the logo would have been a plan and elevation on this new Norman Foster building that is the centre for the games and for the Gymnastics the follow year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-14552</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-14552</guid>
		<description>This logo looks dated, very 1980&#039;s, which may be a trend right now, but should soon roll out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This logo looks dated, very 1980&#8242;s, which may be a trend right now, but should soon roll out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-14181</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-14181</guid>
		<description>Nothing to write home about, which is a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to write home about, which is a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Laughlan</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-13228</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Laughlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-13228</guid>
		<description>I think it is very clear from that interview video that John Donnelly must have been a terrible client for any agency to work for. A Blatant Ponce.

He looks like the kind of client who would be willing to pay an agency hundreds and thousands (of government/charity money) for a brand, but not listen to the professionals. I bet Marque probably made some really good concepts, but Johnny boy had already opened up Microsoft Word and had a little play around with the drawing tools. - &quot;Can you make it this please?&quot;

I agree with the comments above that if the design was left entirely in the hands of the agency then we would have seen a much stronger brand.

Thumbs down for agencies not having the balls to say. STOP.. We know good design, you don&#039;t. Let us do our job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is very clear from that interview video that John Donnelly must have been a terrible client for any agency to work for. A Blatant Ponce.</p>
<p>He looks like the kind of client who would be willing to pay an agency hundreds and thousands (of government/charity money) for a brand, but not listen to the professionals. I bet Marque probably made some really good concepts, but Johnny boy had already opened up Microsoft Word and had a little play around with the drawing tools. &#8211; &#8220;Can you make it this please?&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with the comments above that if the design was left entirely in the hands of the agency then we would have seen a much stronger brand.</p>
<p>Thumbs down for agencies not having the balls to say. STOP.. We know good design, you don&#8217;t. Let us do our job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lairdesign &#124; Corporate Identity, Graphic Design, Web Design and Web Development. Omagh, Co Tyrone, N Ireland &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Trends in Logo Design in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-12830</link>
		<dc:creator>Lairdesign &#124; Corporate Identity, Graphic Design, Web Design and Web Development. Omagh, Co Tyrone, N Ireland &#124; Blog Archive &#124; Trends in Logo Design in 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-12830</guid>
		<description>[...] On a related note the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games logo was revealed in March of this year and was produced by Glasgow Agency Marque. Logodesignlove.com has taken an in-depth look at the design of the logo on their blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-image: url(http://www.logodesignlove.com/wp-content/themes/grid_focus_public/images/comment-logo.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; padding-left: 0px; padding-top: 35px; padding-bottom: 9px">
<p>[...] On a related note the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games logo was revealed in March of this year and was produced by Glasgow Agency Marque. Logodesignlove.com has taken an in-depth look at the design of the logo on their blog. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-12475</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-12475</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, something about it I&#039;m not keen on. Is it the font for the G? Is it the colour combinations maybe?

It might be the size of the G, maybe it should be smaller. Maybe the lines should be thicker?

Something about it is lacking in strength for want of a more descriptive word. I can&#039;t quite put my finger on what&#039;s not making it strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, something about it I&#8217;m not keen on. Is it the font for the G? Is it the colour combinations maybe?</p>
<p>It might be the size of the G, maybe it should be smaller. Maybe the lines should be thicker?</p>
<p>Something about it is lacking in strength for want of a more descriptive word. I can&#8217;t quite put my finger on what&#8217;s not making it strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-12469</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-12469</guid>
		<description>It gets worse!

http://marquecreative.com/#/2014-commonwealth-games/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets worse!</p>
<p><a href="http://marquecreative.com/#/2014-commonwealth-games/" rel="nofollow">http://marquecreative.com/#/2014-commonwealth-games/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Haase</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-12315</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Haase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-12315</guid>
		<description>The G in between the colours looks In Silico.

Just look at the similarities between this and Pendulum&#039;s album In Silico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The G in between the colours looks In Silico.</p>
<p>Just look at the similarities between this and Pendulum&#8217;s album In Silico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estorde</title>
		<link>http://www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-12236</link>
		<dc:creator>estorde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logodesignlove.com/?p=368#comment-12236</guid>
		<description>@Darren seems like a &quot;inspiration&quot; of Row over logo mixing with Galatasary color ans style:
http://galatasaray.theoffside.com/files/2007/10/galatasaray.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darren seems like a &#8220;inspiration&#8221; of Row over logo mixing with Galatasary color ans style:<br />
<a href="http://galatasaray.theoffside.com/files/2007/10/galatasaray.gif" rel="nofollow">http://galatasaray.theoffside.com/files/2007/10/galatasaray.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.logodesignlove.com/glasgow-2014-logo-revealed/feed ) in 0.19077 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 12:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 1:13 pm UTC -->
