Comments on: Logo Design Love Awards judges’ verdict

By: Tiffany Colon

Tiffany Colon — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:16:52 +0000

i really liked the eco geek, de ouro, and the just creative design logos. The reason i liked these is mainly because they were plain and clam but also had some flavor mixed into each of them; and they werent crazy with to much going on.

By: Deeana

Deeana — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:16:37 +0000

My favorite one would have to be ecogeek. I simply like ecogeek because they were talking about being eco friendly and they used a metaphor in the power button. If you noticed the power button you can see that its like a little plant growing and that attracted me to it because i thought it was a very smart and playful.

By: seymour

seymour — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:08:46 +0000

I’m sorry but Jacob Cass’s Just Creative Design logo is absolute crap. Awful, awful logo. breaks so many rules it disgusts me…Why people love it so much I’ll never figure out. He’s a great designer, so how he settled for that I won’t know. Come on people, don’t fool yourselves…Google and Jacob Cass’s logos are TERRIBLE, no matter how much traffic they get!

By: Collections and Logos « Casey Graves UTC Graphic Design

Collections and Logos « Casey Graves UTC Graphic Design — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:16:50 +0000

[...] logo award [...]

By: ellen

ellen — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:53:14 +0000

Thank you for this posting. I loved that i could read the why’s for judging a logo. It’s always great to get some-one in the field educated opinion. The plus here is also to see a collection of great logos all in a row, no close-ones just spot on. Makes things look so easy! Very inspiring! :}

By: Gary

Gary — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:26:14 +0000

ecogeek gets my vote. Thanks for the displays, very interesting logos in this one!

Gave me some great ideas!

By: David Airey

David Airey — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:17:15 +0000

Everyone’s opinion has some degree of validity, Jay, regardless of their design background. Personally, I find the Vulture logo to be striking, projecting a sense of dominance and darkness, almost like a vulture waiting to devour its prey.

The logotype captures the name brilliantly.

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:51:46 +0000

Hi David,
I don’t know what limitations were put on this group of logos, but I still stand with my initial observations. I don’t see how VULTURE could qualify as a logo, let alone make second place. Maybe I’m missing something here, like conceptual thinking beyond just a font choice. Given that I have some 15+ years design experience, I think my opinion has some degree of validity.

Again, I don’t want to come off as arrogant in any way, but it’s just my honest professional opinion without any fluff.

By: David Airey

David Airey — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:26:38 +0000

Hello Jay,

We’re all entitled to our own opinions. One thing that’s important to remember is how the winning designs could only ever be as strong as the logos submitted, and the niches were pretty tight from the outset.

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:19:23 +0000

I have to disagree with some of the choices. VULTURE seems like just a font with a simple effect. As far as FOUND, DISEÑARAMA and UNCRATE, they’re just simply fonts. While ECO GEEK and

I don’t mean to be harsh, but there is a difference between simplicity and simply not trying.